These policies focus upon the various topics including employment and education and health programs. Coercive preferential programs amount to government efforts to solve problems the government created in the first place—rather like using gasoline in an attempt to put out a fire.
Proponents of this view assert that the aim of affirmative action is to promote equality amongst minority and special needs groups who may otherwise experience discrimination. An Ethical and Practical Defense of Affirmative Action Affirmative action has been the subject of increasing debate and tension in American society.
After breaking down the above theories and perspectives, an ethical theorist could come to the same conclusion and disapprove of affirmative action. Participants in the debate have over examined the ethical and moral issues that affirmative action raises while forgetting to scrutinize the system that has created the need for them.
However, placing the needs of one specific affirmative action group over another is contradictory to the aims of the policy and renders itself ineffective. But it may contradict the situation in which an armed neighbour comes to the house to kill occupants.
It would behoove the employer to hire the candidate that best meets these prerequisites, but while utilizing the practice of affirmative action, the employer may not be able to pick the best candidate for the job.
Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Coursework work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours. Board, Blacks were legally pushed to the margin of society where many were left to dwell in poverty and powerlessness. It was the result of a long-standing legal campaign carried on For the purpose of this essay the focus will be on why a Utilitarian might be against the practice of affirmative action.
It would not follow the golden rule to discriminate against anyone, even if they are in the majority.
There are similarities between Ethical Egoism and Utilitarianism in that they are both consequential ethical theories, meaning that they both considered the outcome of an action, rather than the act itself. This essay will analyze how a Utilitarian, a Deontologist, a Virtue Ethicist a Relativist and an Ethical Egoist would argue against the use of affirmative action.
See my Civil Wrongs, chapter 1, for details. Some qualities they may look for in a person are experience, qualification, education, work ethic, employment history, attitude and professionalism. The proportioning of peoples by force is driving them apart rather than bringing them together.
Despite their service and their disabilities, a utilitarian perspective asserts that such decisions must be made based on the greatest amount of good offered to the greatest number of people.
Decades of enforced discrimination left blacks well behind whites politically and socioeconomically.
But affirmative action programs should cause us as a society to re-evaluate how we assess qualifications and how we measure merit.
Ethics and social responsibility 2nd ed. Then, I will discuss the moral and ethical issues raised by continuing to function within a system that systematically disadvantages historically marginalized groups.
The dilemmas themselves indeed seem acute. The Cato Institute,ch. Opponents of Ethical Egoism have long argued that it is a selfish theory, which they argue makes it completely unethical.
Utilitarianism is known as a consequential ethical theory, which simply means that it focuses on the expected outcome of an act, rather than the morality of the act itself or the agent involved in the act.
After analyzing the practice of affirmative action, the Utilitarian could see that more utility is created, for the greater society, when minorities are not given special or preferential treatment over the majority. Discrimination, in all forms, is not a virtuous character quality.
As a result, the Virtue Ethicist might be against affirmative action, because to participate in a discriminatory institution, such as affirmative action, would be to endorse unvirtuous qualities. The Ethical paradox can be understood better by taking an example like we should love our neighbour and this enhances the relationships and works towards a positive society.
This recognized and established the status quo white wealth and Black indigence, white employment and Black unemployment, white opportunity and Black disenfranchisement as an acceptable and neutral baseline.
This essay will analyze how a Utilitarian, a Deontologist, a Virtue Ethicist a Relativist and an Ethical Egoist would argue against the use of affirmative action.
The race has already been tainted. With that in mind, the Deontologist could argue against affirmative action due to discriminatory practices based on race. Deontology The ethical theory of Deontology asserts that there are universal laws in which a moral or just person simply should not violate.
This impact in ones life can not only change their life style and their money Employers had to keep voluminous records on the race, gender, ethnic heritage, and religious background of prospective employees so they could prove they had not discriminated against those designated by the government as victims.
If we do not, we violate our own rules of fairness, preserving the advantages of one runner over the other. These people have jobs to do.Dec 01, · The purpose of this essay will be to make an effective argument against the practice of affirmative action using ethical theories, perspectives and logical cheri197.com: On The Move with Mack Worley.
- Affirmative Action Affirmative action is a deliberate effort to provide full and equal opportunities in employment, education, and other areas for women, minorities, and individuals belonging to other traditionally disadvantaged groups.
Affirmative action is an overarching term that refers to the way schools and businesses select employees and students. Much of affirmative action involves exterminating discrimination and including a certain amount of individuals from different ethnic groups, genders, cultures, etc.
in the business, school or other program. Affirmative action is. Affirmative action has been a controversial issue, because some forms of affirmative action can be seen as reverse discrimination.
There are various arguments for and against affirmative action. Both sides of the argument share the same grounds.
These grounds are social utility, and fairness, justice, and equality%(2). Affirmative Action Essay Affirmative Action Right? Affirmative action has The question of whether or not affirmative action is ethical is one of the most contentious areas of debate that lies on the issue of ethnicity, gender, values, traditions.
capabilities. In this essay I will expose what I see as the shortcomings of the current ethical attacks on affirmative. action (1), the main one being, that these attacks are devoid of proper historical context and.Download